Your basket is currently empty!

Hifisonix sx-Amplifier: A 15 W Class A Current Feedback Amplifier
Originally published in August 2012.
Click here to order a set of DS THP PCBs for the sx-Amplifier from Jim’s Audio
About 150 sx-Amplifier PCB sets have been sold, with most of those going on to be built. As you can read about in the PDF below, my class A journey started off after listening to an ancient Musical Fidelity A1 that I repaired for a friend while living in Taiwan. I’ve had many emails from sx-Amp builders who have loved the sound, despite this being a very simple and not particularly low distortion amplifier. If you are new to DIY audio, this is probably a good as any place to start.
The hifisonix sx-Amplifier is a low component count current feedback topology (CFA) design that delivers 15W RMS in class A into an 8 Ohm load (about 25W peak in class A) and around 25W RMS into 4 Ohms in class AB mode. The design uses readily available components, achieves very wide bandwidth, along with fast rise and fall times. Distortion is low compared to competing designs (e.g. JLH’s 10 Watter from 1969, or Jean Hiraga’s 20 W class A), thanks to the availability of modern bipolar devices, and the use of LTSpice to optimize the design.
You can down load the full pdf article here The-sx-Amplifier-V2.10
Here is an Excel file that contains the BOM lists, including Mouser part numbers for the sx-Amplifier (covers both the double sided THP PCB version ABOVE and the new single sided PCB version discussed below):-
sx-Amplifier-BOM-Excel-September-2016
I have had a lot of requests for PCB’s and/or people indicating they would like to etch their own boards. To support these requests, I’ve created a second layout that is singled sided and more amenable to home etching. (The PDF file scale is 1:1):
Here is the component overlay for the single sided sx-Amp SS sx-Amp Top Component Overlay
Here are the Gerbers for the single sided sx-Amp Single sided sx-Amp Gerbers
Pop Alexandru, also known as Alex MM on diyAudio.com has also kindly produced a set of single sided PDF layouts below that closely follow my DS THP version. He has produced both mirrored and non-mirrored versions. His boards are neater than mine! Thank you Alex!
SX-AMPLIFIER TOP SILK SCREEN MIRRORED
SX-AMPLIFIER SINGLE SIDED COMP OVERLAY
SX-AMPLIFIER SINGLE SIDED BOTTOM
SX-AMPLIFIER SINGLE SIDED BOTTOM MIRRORED
Note: there are no single sided PSU layouts. If you build the sx-Amp using single sided PCB’s, and your own PSU, do not forget to fit your finished amplifier with a Zobel network of 0.1uF and 10 Ohms in series from J7 to the 0V star ground on your PSU. If using the DS THP PSU board from Jim’s Audio, the Zobel network is located on the PSU board. Just follow the wiring up instructions in the writeup.
Note: the component numbers and BOM list are all the same for the single sided PCB but with the following changes: J2 is removed. C2 becomes a 16V 10uF through hole capacitor (C1 remains a 1206 10uF 50V MLCC SMD device); Q3 becomes a BC547C.
If you have any questions or concerns, please post your comment up here, or on the DIYaudio forum here: https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/236522-sx-amp-nx-amp.html
Here is diyAudio member Thimios from Greece showing his fantastic sounding sx-Amplifier
_____________________________________________________________________________
The sx-Amplifier: A 15 W Current Feedback Class A Amplifier
Jean Hiraga’s 20 W class A design became something of a cult amplifier in the 1980s in the audio community and constructors from Europe, Australia, Japan and the USA praised it’s sonic performance. In that design, Hiraga used a much simplified (I’d call it sparse, or ‘stripped down’) current feedback amplifier (CFA) topology and low feedback to create an amplifier that was described somewhere as sounding ‘liquid’ and ‘tube-like’. Hiraga has always been noted for his minimalist, idiosyncratic designs, and comments about the sonics aside, I was attracted to the simplicity – only 8 transistors in the original and a handful of discrete components (excluding the power supply of course) for a complete class A amplifier. Distortion was by any standards very high, topping out at about 1.8% at the rated power into 8 Ω, although he seems to have indicated it was of the ‘good variety’ due to its harmonic structure. However, Hiraga’s amplifier (rated at 20 Watts per channel into 8 Ω) was the product of 1980’s know-how and device technology. I found myself wondering what I could cook up with today’s components and the insights afforded by circuit simulation tools that were unavailable back in the early eighties. I did quite a bit of research on Geoff Moss’s excellent ‘the class A amplifer site’ (tcaas) and Rod Elliot’s ESP site and the Death of Zen (DoZ) amplifier, modelled after JLH’s classic 10-Watt design from 1969. Compared to the 1980s, we now have some really good power transistors, and there is no shortage of cheap good quality small signal devices either, other than the ultra-low noise small signal bipolar and JFETs from Toshiba in Japan of course, which are now discontinued.
Looking at the reprint of JLH’s original 1969 10 W class A design, it is immediately apparent that the distortion vs. frequency graph at 9 W output is flat all the way out to the measurement limit, which was beyond 20 kHz. In a conventional Voltage Control Amplifier (VCA) class AB topology, when driving a load that causes the output stage to exit the very narrow class A bias region (ideally set at .026/Retot where Retot is the total output transistor emitter degeneration resistance including the reflected base resistance and typically ranging from 0.1 Ω through to 0.47 Ω), distortion kinks upwards at 40 dB/decade, with the kink point a few hundred Hz up to a few kHz. Distortion increases at 40 dB/decade, arising from the fact that the amplifier loop gain beyond the -3 dB point is decreasing at -20 dB/decade, while the THD contribution doubles with every octave because with every doubling of frequency, there is a doubling of cross over events, and hence distortion.
The shape of the distortion curve over frequency tells us something about the nature of class AB amplifiers when required to move from their class A region into class B – feedback can only do so much to reduce the distortion, and if that feedback (loop gain) is already decreasing at 20 dB/decade within the audio band, you simply have to accept the uptick in the distortion vs. frequency plot. JLH’s output stage design was class A of course, and so did not have to contend with crossover distortion, and this is the fundamental advantage of class A over class AB. The major distortion component in any competently designed class AB amplifier is the crossover distortion, and if that can be removed as a factor, there are significant performance and sound benefits to be had. At low frequencies (i.e. below about 30 Hz), the distortion on JLH’s amp rose rapidly because of the electrolytic coupling cap between the output and the speaker. Later enhancements of his design did away with the output coupling capacitor at the expense of a split rail supply and output offset adjustment.
The sx-Amplifier is a thoroughly modern take on the class A genre that employs CFA topology, 30 MHz Ft output devices and features a – 3dB bandwidth of 540 kHz, along with slew rates of 140 V/us. This is a very smooth sounding amplifier, suited to jazz, classical and acoustic material in general which should be married to speakers with efficiencies of 92 dB/W or better if one is after realistic concert hall sound levels – however, I used mine whilst in Asia with my B&W 703’s, which are rated at 89 dB/W, in a modest sized listening space and found that satisfactory volume levels were easily attainable.
In the design you see here, I had the transformer specially wound by ‘PowerStar’ in Taiwan and it features a screen and GOSS band for the best noise performance. Careful attention to layout and wiring have resulted in an exceptionally quiet amplifier. What does it sound like? As mentioned earlier, this amplifier is best suited to classical, jazz and acoustic material – because of the limited power on tap, its not really suited to rock or material that demands high power.
The photograph below is of the second build I did of the sx-Amp.
This is the sx-Amp I ended up using up until the kx2-Amp arrived some 10 years later in 2022. Incidentally, I built one of the nx-Amplifiers into a similar chassis.
I have to admit I started this project with some apprehension about what a small amp would sound like – especially since I am used to listening to a big amp (250 W per channel which you can read about here Ovation 250 Amplifier and a 180 Watter called the e-Amp ). Why design a 15 W class A amplifier, and especially one that is decidedly minimalist, after two big, complex, powerful, high performance ones? Well, there are a few reasons. Firstly, designing single digit, or sub 1 ppm distortion amplifiers can provide a rewarding intellectual experience, if only to later be thwarted by practical execution that impacts both performance and build aesthetics. Secondly, reductions in distortion below about 0.5% offer little or no further improvements in the perceived sound quality of an amplifier in controlled testing and there is a lot of academic material in support of this contention. Anecdotally, Nelson Pass has built a name for himself with class A amplifiers that for the most part never see the south side of 0.1%, and yet are highly rated by the cognoscenti. What about power levels? Big amplifiers sound wonderfully at ease with themselves – they are unflappable and handle music dynamics well. Low power amplifiers, like the sx-Amp under discussion here, really need to offer something unique to justify the effort in construction, and exploring this territory is the 3rd reason for undertaking this project: is there a magic class A sound that makes building something like this worth it?
Speakers are notoriously non-linear often 2 to 3 times higher than the 0.5% I quoted above. Now, none of this can serve as an excuse for badly designed, sloppily engineered, high distortion amplifiers. We know that the ear is much more sensitive to some types of distortion (crossover for example) and to higher order harmonic content in particular. If these things are taken as considered inputs into the design process, we then have some latitude in design philosophy: Challenging, all out, ultra-low distortion designs, or something a little less demanding, but that ticks all of the right boxes given our knowledge about how the ear/brain system works and therefore sounds good because we avoid the major pitfalls, and is FUN TO BUILD! This is exactly where the sx-Amp is positioned.
Once testing and set up were completed, I was very excited to hear what this thing could do. For initial listening I chose a few classical CD’s – a Lexus classical CD (freebie), Julian Bream ‘The Ultimate Guitar Collection’, a wonderful ‘LSO Live’ sampler from Hi-Fi News, A Philips Sampler from the 1990’s ‘Introducing Mozart’, followed by two jazz CD’s: Michel Petrucciani’s ‘Both Worlds’ and ‘Time Out’ from The Dave Brubeck Quartet.
Pictured above is the very first sx-Amplifier I build in 2012 while living in Japan
I’ve had a Hi-Fi News LSO sampler for about seven or eight years. The tracks date from performances made between 1999 through 2002. All tracks superbly recorded with tremendous space (holographic) and dynamic range. The sx-Amp produced a wonderful three dimensional sound stage that extended well beyond the speakers, very deep and layered front to back. If you are ever looking for a classical demo CD – this has to be it! To be sure, a big part of this is the quality of the recordings, but no doubt the class A magic also played an important role in what I was hearing. Strings have that ‘bite’ to them in their lower registers and the top end shimmers marvelously; brass has the leading edge snap followed by the tizz that you only get from a really good recording played through a sympathetic signal chain. The top end on this amplifier is very beguiling without any hint of harshness and the overriding sensation is one of smoothness and relaxed detachment. The scale on the Brahm’s piece (‘Denn Alles Fleisch Est Wie Gras’) was very well reproduced which was surprising to me given the fact that only 15 W was on hand.
Up next was a double CD collection of Julian Bream recordings covering the four decades from 1959 through 1982. Some of the early recordings are a little noisy (tape hiss) but the sound is very spacey and the notes wonderfully rounded and resonant. My favourite is disc 2, which was recorded in 1982/83 and consists entirely of solo guitar and lute pieces. Here again, the sound staging and recording venue are beautifully captured and easily re-created by the sx-Amp.
Philips – when they were still in the music business – released a huge Mozart collection in about 1992 or ’93 and I’ve had the collection sampler about 20 years. There are 19 tracks and the recordings vary from good to outstanding. One of my favourites is the horn concerto in E-flat. I think Sir Neville Mariner’s recording is one of the best – the horn really floats out above the orchestra and the reverb and scale of the recording space make for an incredibly immersive experience. The whole piece is energetically played – I have found some other recordings, because of the arrangements and the conducting no doubt, to be laborious, plodding and acoustically flat by comparison. This recording is one of the better ones on this CD – I think some of the tracks are a little bright (maybe that’s just because it’s Mozart!), but the horn concerto is beautifully balanced. The sx-Amp presented a very smooth, rounded sound with no hint of harshness. The layering front to back was very precise, and the left to right sound stage wide, though not as far beyond the edges of the speakers as the LSO CD – a wonderful listen however.
Dave Brubeck’s ‘Time Out’ always amazes be because it was recorded in 1959 (like some of Julian Bream’s recordings mentioned above) and you can hear the tape hiss and one or two other minor imperfections, and yet the sound is absolutely palpable. This is a re-mastered re-release but is has lost none of the quality of the original. The cymbals, always a very difficult sound to reproduce accurately, are as smooth as silk and seem to hang in the air – I’ve heard more recent recordings where they sound flat and lifeless by comparison. Paul Desmond’s alto sax and the bass, played by Eugene Wright, have some wonderful space around them on ‘Strange Meadow Lark’, one of my favorite tracks on this CD. The sx-Amp is able to convey the sparseness of the music, and the recording, reproducing the very wide and deep sound stage – very three dimensional. Again, as with the other recordings, there is a sense of a very relaxed, effortless, smooth sound.
Most of the tracks on Michael Petrucciani’s ‘Both Worlds’ are spaciously recorded and the sound staging is good. The sx-Amp again did a great job of conveying the space around the musicians. There are a few tracks where the brass is set well back in the mix and this lends great depth to the recording, although in general the sound stage is not particularly wide. I was pleased to discover the sx-Amp could give the same sensation of depth as the Ovation 250 and the e-Amp, which offer a first class listening experience in this regard.
I have not said much about the bass performance of this amplifier. You’d expect a 15 W amplifier like this lack the scale of higher power examples, but I was pleasantly surprised at how realistic the bass reproduction was. Importantly, it had weight and the notes were well sustained. I’ve heard a lot of systems where the bass is very lumpy. No doubt the speakers and recording play a role here, but if there are any shortcomings in the amplifier’s ability to reproduce bass notes exactly as they are recorded, or drive the speakers effectively, you can bet the overall sound is going to be disappointing. Bass plays an important part in imparting space and weight to a piece of reproduced music – this is one of the reasons sub’s often seem to bring a system to life, despite the fact that they are producing little or no acoustic output above 100 Hz or so.
My B&W 703s are moderately efficient at 89 dB/W, and they are a relatively easy load to drive, so getting reasonable SPLs out of this set up is doable. The sx-Amp output stage is hefty, so up to the limits of the power supply voltage, it has no problem delivering plenty of current when required.
Of course, this is not an amplifier for a ‘head banger’ music set-up – the sx-Amp is better suited to jazz, classical chamber and acoustic music. If you want 3D sound staging and shimmering highs on strings, this amp does it. If you have some efficient horns or suchlike (96 dB/W and above), then 15 W is going to allow you to get realistic orchestral levels, although I never found this to be an issue on the material I tried on my speakers as described above.
The sx-Amp achieved all of the goals I set out when starting this project: a simple design using modern, readily available components with wide bandwidth and speed (i.e. fast rise/fall times). The design goal called for wide loop gain, which was achieved through the selection of the CFA topology. I was not expecting any huge surprises sonically, but after completing a few hours of listening tests, I can say the sx-Amp is wonderfully smooth, open and has a very relaxed, non-fatiguing sound – not what I was expecting at all, and a really pleasant surprise.
The earlier designs from JLH and Hiraga are highly regarded and as of 2025, JLH’s is over 55 years and Hiraga’s close to 45, but they have clearly stood the test of time as constructors return time and again to their simplicity, circuit elegance and sound. Nelson Pass’s mosfet based designs, some of which date back 35 or 40 years, feature simple, elegant circuits, and much of the effort is focused on the harmonic structure of the distortion – his class A amplifiers are also legendary within the DIY community and noted for their sonics.
I hope that the sx-Amp joins this august group of DIY amplifiers, and emerges as a ‘modern take’ on what is ultimately a very specialist and esoteric audiophile segment: minimalist low power class A amplifiers that focus on listenability.
Comments
103 responses to “Hifisonix sx-Amplifier: A 15 W Class A Current Feedback Amplifier”
I am build 2 monoblock sx amp ,
But my my plan is build psu with 4 lt1083 linear regulator individual (because my toroid is 4 X 0-30 ) to down the voltage @22vdc each
And connect 2 of them to symmetrical
So i can get -22 0 +22 dc to feed each monoblock sx amp.
Iam understand enough about star ground.Satria, I don’t understand how you plane to connect this. Can you confirm what amp you are building and how many channnels?
or my plan is to use 4 lt1083 with 0-30 0-30 0-30 0-30 toroid
with 4 rectifiersIts 30-0-30 , and i have large heatsink for th LT1083
On datasheet LT1083 can handle up to 7.5amp /vin – vout @ max =25v
RegardsIs that 15-0-15 or 30-0-30?
Ok thanks for the answer.
Btw my toroid is Ct 30vac , can i use LT1083 linear psu , if can any suggestion schematicRegards
Sauria,
I don’t recommend you do this. The 10V supplies are heavily decoupled to ensure the start up is slow and symmetrical to avoid pops on start up and switch off. The regulators won’t like the heavy capacitive load and won’t bring any improvements to the sx-Amplifier. Just stick with the zeners.Regards
Andrew
🙂
Hi . Can i replace / modification two zener 10v with lm78L10 & lm79L10
Best regards
Hello lurii
Yes you can use those
Regards
Andrew
HI! Can I use MJL4281A/MJL4302A transistors?
This should work ok with the kx2 Amp. The input impedance is c. 10k. If your preamp needs a highe load, you can change R24 on the amplifier to 22k. If you do this, you must re-adjust the output offset.
I think a tube preamp + kx2 will be a good combo!
Regards
Andrew
Thanks for the response. I was meaning to use a tube preamplifier (just a matter of personal preference). In this case, do I need to make some modification to the input circuit ?
According to the manufacturer, the preamp has output impendance of about 3 kOhm and gain can be set to 7 (17 dB) or 11 (21 dB), no idea about the actual output voltage in these cases.
Hello Filip – the input sensitivity on the sx, nx and kx2 amplifiers is all about 1V for full output. On all my power amplifiers, you can feed them directly from a CD player with a volume control – so no need for additional gain. If you are using a T/T or legacy analog source (tape deck, tuner etc) you will need a preamp.
Hi,
Can you tell me the input sensitivity please ?
Is ti a good practice to incorporate a preamp, for example CD or computer audio card with SX amplifier ?Regards,
Dennis,
I will come back to you on Monday or Tuesday to try to fix your problem.Hi,
I have build the sx amplifier and it sound great. The only problem is that it hums. But only when left and right are connected to the pré amplifier. Not connected or only one side it is quied.
Do u have An Idea what i can do?
The rca cinch connectors are on the left and right side of the cabinet. I use a cable with a Red and white cable and a braid as shield. Red is plus white on the ground of the rca and pin one on PCB, braid only connected on PCB side to pin 3.
Hope you can help.
Best regards,
DennisHello Frits – I have reloaded the sx-Amp BOM as a Zip file. If you down load this and unzip it should work now.
I will email it to you separately anyway.
rgds
Andrew
Hello Frits. Yes I will do it later today.
I noticed the link to the BOM is not working on the sx-Amp page. Apologies for that.
Re the boards, these are all high quality boards. If you have problems getting your amp going, please post up your question here, or on the diyAudio sx and nx-Amp thread.
Regards
Andrew
Hi Andrew,
Can you e-mail me an BOM list for the SX amplifier?Hello Fritz,
Yes, I designed the sx-Amp and the PCB’s. Please download the sx-amplifier document and I will send you some notes a bit later on the changes (quite small – so should be easy).
Regards
Andrew
Hi,
I got via Ebay some older version of the Ovation. Two power supplies and the amp booards.
They are from 2012 sx Amplifier V1.0 Adrew C Russell.
Is there any information available to get this to a good end? I search here but did not found any from this older version. Mabey you can help me with this project?
With regards
FritsHello Elmar,
Please can you email the layouts to me.
I will come back to you on the bias adjustment in the next few days – I just moved to a new house so everything is still in boxes.
Regards
Andrew
Hello Andrew,
thank you very much for your kind answer. I designed two different single sided layout for the sx.
With one I have problems as it gives me only the upper wave of a sinus. I wonder if the layout is
faulty.
The second is fine so far and works nicely but I don´t get the bias lower than 1A1. Any advice from your side?
If wished I could mail both layouts to you for everybodys use as an alterative .
Kind regards
ElmarHello Elmar,
Yes, a single sided version of the sx-Amp is available – please look on the sx-Amp page here: sx-Amp Single Sided.If you have any technical questions, you can contact me. Although I am no longer in DIY audio, there is quite a strong builders thread who can also help.
Regards
Andrew
Hi,
“Many people are asking for sx-Amp boards, but they need single sided to etch by themselves. Please wait a few days. ”
So do I. Is such layout availlable somewhere? And are you for help?
Kind regards
ElmarHello Eric,
thanks for your question. Both of these capacitors are SMD MLCC types. you can use the same voltage capacitor for either position (25 or 50 Volts). The SMD MLCC capacitors are not polarized so they can go in any way around.
Dear sir,
I was looking at the SX-amp schematic and there appeared a question about C2.
Why is it used as through-hole component? Could it be used same kind of SMD as C1 is?
Is the C2 polarity marked right on PCB (plus towards to emitter of Q3)? On schematic included in PDF-document polarity of C2 is not marked at all.regards,
Daniel,
Please see fig. 15 on page 29 of the sx-Amplifier write up. I recommend you use a 200-250VA transformer.
Hello Andrew,
Could you please help me to locate the PSU schematic for this A Class amplifier? I could not find it.
Thank you,
DanThank you Magnus for your feedback – appreciate it. I am very pleased you like the sound!
Amp is finished. Beatiful sound. Great amp!
Had a short writeup on diyaudio.com
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/236522-sx-amp-nx-amp-34.html#post4580733
Thanks alot for design, sharing and good help
Sincerely
MagnusHi again. Pleas disregard my former post about low gain.
It was my dcb1 that caused the problems 🙂 Direct from dac I can play at earbleeding levels if necessary 🙂 This amp just sounds superb.
Well it does rock also. No problem there with efficient speakers. Its dead silent when its supposed to.
Been playing for 4 hours straight now. No issues.
Will take it on the bench later for some more measurements and checks, and perhaps final adjustments.Magnus,
for offset adjustment, you must let the amplifer get hot – so do an intitial trim of offset about 1~2 minutes after the amplifier is powered up. Then let the amplifer get hoy.
Then adjust the offset to 0 mV out.Its ok for the offset to drift around by 1-2mV. The main cause of this is thermal gradients and especially when you have it exposed on the bench. Further offsets of up to +-20mV are of no consequence in any event.
Note that once set up, when you turn the amplifier on from cold, the offset will be at max – probably 50mV or so, but could be a bit higher. In the first 2~3 minutes a lot of the offset will disappear and then as the amp gets warm, it will settle to its final value – it will take about 10 minutes to get to <10mV and after about 20 minutes or so, you should be in low single digit offsets.
Another builder, Vinnie from Italy, also struggled to dial the offset out so I told him to change R1 to 4.7k. However, I still want to do some more investigation before I make it a permanent change to the circuit – I had no problems dialing out the offset on my 3 builds with R1 = 10k.
Good awaiting your answer.
I have made the mods on both channels now. I am sure there are more elegant methods of fixing it (cut a trace for the Base under the pcb and hardwire together so its out of sight)
Or maybe alter R20/R21 to make R6 work – get the right ratio? I guess the bias adjustment is because of ratio between (R20+R6)/R21? Or is it more to it?Meanwhile both channels are now under test. Both raises to approx 1.46A at turn on before settling a bit.. (1.4A).
The left channel bounces in current a bit more than the right, it has a tendency to keep raising the hotter it gets.
When measuring DC offset I can dial in the right channel at 0.00mV and it bounces 1-2mV.
The left channel I had to reduce R1 to 5kohm (another 10kohm in parallell) because I was unable to dial it anymore than -40mV.
After that I was able to dial it further down to 0.00mV. But this channel bounces between +-10mV. Is that ok?What can the cause of this be?
Are there some issues I should be aware of? The TIS transistors maybe?Best Regards
MagnusMagnus,
I have boards with me – I will take a look tomorrow Monday and come back to you.
Rgds
Andrew
Magnus,
Before you power up, you must adjust R6 (1k pot) for MAX resistance I.e 1 k ohms. Measure across the pot for 1k.
This should set the power up current to between 300-350 mA total current for the amplifier as measured across the fuse holder. After this is established, you can adjust the current up to 1.4 Amps total (700 mA per pair).
Note, if you insert R6 the wrong way around, then indeed as you turn it counterclockwise, th current will go up. It’s not important which way you turn it – just make sure its sitting at 1.4A total for the amplifier.
Note, if you set R6 to minimum (0 Ohms as measured across the pot) the current will indeed be maximum.
Please feel free to email me.
Hmm – what is strange is that when R6 is at min (~0 ohm) the current is at max and vice versa..
R20 and R21 is 1k.
What can cause this?
Changing the Q3 for another bc550c…Hello Magnus, please can you check with your meter the Ohms value of R20. If it is a high value, or it is not in circuit for some reason, you would have this problem. Also, if R21 is shorted, or very low, you will get this issue. Also, double check that R6 is 1k.
Yes you are correct. R4 is connected across C13 on the Jims audio pcbs.
Nice find.Interesting. Will also do some checks.
Hopefully will have some sound in a week or two.
BTW: I am using toshiba 2sa1360/2sc3423 as VAS drivers.
Got them from a local retailer here in Norway but I really dont know if they are the real deal or fake.Also got an old poweramplifier also with 2sa1360/sc3423 as drivers that I may source another pair from.
Sincerely
Happy new year
Vinnie, please send it to bonsai(@)hifisonix.com.
You must remove the ‘(‘ and the ‘)’.
Thank you
Andree
Tell me which is the address where I could send the photos.
Vinnie
Vinnie, please send me a photo. I have a blank board here I can also check.
Hi Andrew,
discovered where the problem is. There is an error in the layout. R14 is erroneously connected across c13. That’s why the input impedance was so low, also with an attenuation of about 38 db. Simply discottecting r4 everything runs in the right way, showing the incredible sound of this amplifier. If you need I can send you a photo, but I think the peoblem should be told on the forum.
Vinnie
Vinnie, the gain of the sx-Amp is 14.33x. You will need 1.39V peak to drive it to full power. This is quite a normal input signal level for an amplifier like this. Please check that the values of the feedbzck resistors R12 to R16 are 1k each and that R11 is 15 Ohms. J2 must be linked out.
Good morning Andrew,
this morning, after setting the Bias currrent and zero offset following your indications, I tried the sx amplifier. It was put in my official chain, including Roksan Rok-DP1 cd plyer, Wadia X-32 Digimaster converter and Klyne SK6 preamplifier set at 20 db gain.
The ouput level of the ampifier is incredibly low. It seems that the input sensitivity is very high, Higher than every amplifier I experienced.
I really don’t know where the problem is. I followed exactly the instructions of your paper, selecting all the components. The only changes made where the input stage with 550/560 instead of 546/556 and the different TIS transistors, indicated as a susbtitute in the DIY forum.
I don’t know if there is another value wrong in the schematic or in the layout, but the problem occurs in both the channels. So I think it’s very difficult that I made a mistake twice.
I hope you could help me to find where the problem is, otherwise I should consider my Sx Ampifier project failed.
I hope in your indications.Thanks
Vinnie
Vinnie, for now, please change R1 to 4.7k and you should be able to centre it.
I will have to look into this some more.
The question is: on both the channels seems that the zero offset adjustment is not centered.
The range is between -450 mV to -50mV. How is possible to center it? What should I change? Or how is it possible to widen the offset range of that trimmer?Thanks
Vinnie
Is J2 shorted out?
The same happens on the other channel. -65mV is the minimum near zero.
I should change something? I should change R30 and R31 with 33 ohms instead 15 ohms?Let me know.
Vinnie
Leave a Reply